Close Menu

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    US sanctions Russian money laundering network that used USDT

    May 18, 2026

    Capital B deploys newly raised funds into $15.1M bitcoin purchase

    May 18, 2026

    Norwegian news site accused of creating crypto holder ‘hit list’

    May 18, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Block Buzz News
    • Bitcoin
    • Coinbase
      • Litecoin
      • Altcoins
    • Blockchain
    • Crypto
    • Ethereum
    • Lithosphere News Releases
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    Block Buzz News
    Home » Security Alert – Solidity – Variables can be overwritten in storage
    Ethereum

    Security Alert – Solidity – Variables can be overwritten in storage

    Sophia BrownBy Sophia BrownMarch 31, 2026No Comments2 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Summary: In some situations, variables can overwrite other variables in storage.

    Affected Solidity compiler versions: 0.1.6 to 0.4.3 (including 0.4.4 pre-release versions)

    Detailed description:

    Storage variables that are smaller than 256 bits are packed together into the same 256 bit slot if they can fit. If a value larger than what is allowed by the type is assigned to the first variable, that value will overwrite the second variable.

    This means if an attacker can cause an overflow in the value of the first variable, then the second variable can be modified. Creating an overflow in the first variable is possible using arithmetics or by directly passing in a value from the call data (values in call data are aligned to 32 bytes, and padding is neither verified nor enforced).

    Contracts that only use the types listed below for state variables are not affected. Arrays, mappings and structs (based on those following types) are also not affected:

    • signed integers, including sizes smaller than 256 bits
    • bytesNN types, including sizes smaller than 256 bits
    • unsigned integers (uint) of 256 bits

    Contracts with types smaller than 256 bits that are never next to each other (note that state variables of base contracts are “pulled in”) are not affected.

    The Ethereum multisignature wallet contract is not affected.
    Note that addresses take up 160 bits, so contracts that only use addresses and 256-bit types are safe. Additionally, addresses and booleans are almost never manipulated via arithmetic operations in practice, so contracts using only addresses, booleans and 256 bit types should also be safe.

    The following contracts may be affected:
    Contracts containing two or more contiguous state variables where the sum of their sizes is less than 256 bits and the first state variable is not a signed integer and not of bytesNN type.

    Types smaller than 256 bits include:
    bool, enums, uint8, …, uint248, int8, …, int248, address, any contract type

    Recommended action:

    • Recompile contracts that have not yet been deployed using at least Solidity release 0.4.4 (not the pre-release or nightly version).
    • Deactivate, remove funds from, or upgrade already deployed contracts.

    This vulnerability was found by [github.com/catageek](https://github.com/catageek): [https://github.com/ethereum/solidity/issues/1306](https://github.com/ethereum/solidity/issues/1306)



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Sophia Brown

    Related Posts

    Clear Signing: Making Transaction Approvals Safer on Ethereum

    May 12, 2026

    Protocol Cluster Updates: May 2026

    May 11, 2026

    Soldøgn Interop Recap ☀️ | Ethereum Foundation Blog

    May 2, 2026

    Announcing Cohort 7 of the Ethereum Protocol Fellowship

    April 30, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    Strategy manager wrong about BTC backing STRC

    March 19, 2026

    Announcing The Road To Devcon Grants

    March 19, 2026

    Bitcoin price drops to $70k as hot PPI data and Powell speech cast doubts over rate cuts

    March 19, 2026

    Iran’s central bank stacked $507M USDT last year, report

    March 19, 2026
    Don't Miss
    Coinbase

    US sanctions Russian money laundering network that used USDT

    By John SmithMay 18, 2026

    TGR Group, an alleged Russian money laundering network, has been disrupted by a joint effort…

    Capital B deploys newly raised funds into $15.1M bitcoin purchase

    May 18, 2026

    Norwegian news site accused of creating crypto holder ‘hit list’

    May 18, 2026

    Forsage co-founder pleads not guilty in $340M crypto Ponzi case

    May 18, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from SmartMag about art & design.

    About Us

    BlockBuzzNews: Your daily dose of the latest in cryptocurrency trends, insights, and updates!

    Our Picks

    US sanctions Russian money laundering network that used USDT

    May 18, 2026

    Capital B deploys newly raised funds into $15.1M bitcoin purchase

    May 18, 2026

    Norwegian news site accused of creating crypto holder ‘hit list’

    May 18, 2026
    Most Popular

    Strategy manager wrong about BTC backing STRC

    March 19, 2026

    Announcing The Road To Devcon Grants

    March 19, 2026

    Bitcoin price drops to $70k as hot PPI data and Powell speech cast doubts over rate cuts

    March 19, 2026

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.